| ⇐ Previous Article — Table of Contents —  Next Article ⇒New Energy Times home page
   15.  Development of the Widom-Larsen Theory of LENRs By  Steven B. Krivit With  this article, New Energy Times reveals the history of the Widom-Larsen theory  of low-energy nuclear reactions.  Both  Allan Widom, a condensed matter physicist with Northeastern University,  and Lewis Larsen, president and chief executive officer of Lattice Energy LLC,  have been reluctant in the past to speak with the media about the development of their  theory.  Widom  has declined repeated phone and e-mail requests from New Energy Times, but  Larsen has agreed to speak with us.   He  has an undergraduate degree in biochemistry and a master’s degree in business  from the University   of Chicago. As an  undergraduate, he audited courses in astrophysics under Nobel Prize-winning physicist  Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar.  Larsen  enrolled in a doctoral program in theoretical biophysics at the University of Miami until a block grant from the  Atomic Energy Commission was terminated. He had finished his coursework and was  working on his dissertation.  Later on,  he worked as a financial and securities analyst and was cited by Barron's as a  "futurist" with a "dead-on prediction" about a "coming  technology revolution." He  told New Energy Times about his early  involvement in LENR.  "In  1997, I was running a technology consulting company," Larsen said,  "and one of our clients asked, 'Are there any wild cards in energy?' We  were working in energy and information management and control systems.  "I  remembered the cold fusion controversy from 1989, so I went looking for a  scientist who was with a major university, had a decent reputation in  thermonuclear fusion research and who was working in LENR. Through the early  Internet search engines, I found George Miley at the University of Illinois  at Urbana-Champaign. "When  I saw the 1996 Miley transmutation  research I remembered an elemental abundances chart I had seen 30 years  earlier when I was studying astrophysics," Larsen said. "I recognized  similar peaks and abundances, and began to suspect that LENRs were  neutron-catalyzed reactions, just like similar processes in stars." Despite  his fascination, he approached the work cautiously, and in 1998, he sought the  independent opinions of two top nuclear physicists in the U.S. He asked  them whether Miley's data were accurate and appeared to reflect a genuine  nuclear process. Both said yes. Around  1998, Larsen saw a very similar five-peak elemental spectrum from Japanese LENR researcher Tadahiko Mizuno (see "Who's Afraid of LENR Transmutations?" in this special report). "Miley's  transmutation experiments and Mizuno's showed different relative sizes of the  peaks in different parts of the mass spectrum due to different seed elements initially  present in the electrolyte," Larsen said. "However, the most amazing  thing was that Mizuno's experiments were with heavy water and Miley's were with  light water.  "At  that point, I knew the coincidence could not be just accidental. I knew then that  the heavy-water and light-water results were part of the same phenomenon.   "I  also knew that neutrons were the key; I had a conceptual understanding of the  theory worked out by then but not the precise details of how the neutrons were  formed." Larsen  started Lattice Energy LLC in 2000 and conceived the idea of ultra-low-momentum  neutrons.  "I  realized they had to be ultra-low-momentum neutrons," Larsen said,  "because researchers saw the results of transmutations but they never saw  the neutrons, aside from, possibly, spallation neutrons. I also knew there had  to be some kind of gamma conversion mechanism. Somehow, the electrons were  suppressing the gamma radiation." In  May 2001, he received his first seed funding, and during Thanksgiving week that  year, he had his first telephone meeting with government scientists. This was  the first step in his outreach to several national laboratories.  Larsen  said that he and Widom have participated in numerous private federal government  meetings and briefings. He said that federal agencies have been interested in  the theory for a variety of reasons. However, he has not received federal  funding.  "They  sucked all kinds of information out of us, but they never gave us a dime and  never proposed any significant funding," Larsen said. The  next insight for Larsen came in 2002. In June, Japanese LENR researcher  Yasuhiro Iwamura, with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, published new research  showing LENR transmutations.  Several  years earlier, Iwamura had filed a U.S. patent and hypothesized how a  neutron-based mechanism might be responsible for the LENR transmutations, but  Iwamura did not have a specific mechanism to account for the formation of the  neutrons.  Larsen  also learned that Mizuno had recognized the potential viability of weak  interactions, as Mizuno published in his 1997 book. "Sometime  around July 2002," Larsen said, "Miley had just returned from the  ICCF-9 conference in China,  and he showed me a copy of the Iwamura paper. He asked me if I believed it and  if I thought the data was correct. I responded, 'Yes, I'm very confident,'  without explaining to Miley why I was so confident.  "By  that time, I had already performed my independent due diligence on Miley's  transmutation data. He thought his five-peak transmutation spectrum was the  result of a fission process." In  the summer of 2003, before the ICCF-10 conference, Larsen learned about the  successful laser triggering and gold surface treatment reported by U.S. LENR  researchers Dennis Cravens and Dennis Letts. He also heard claims that the  Letts-Cravens effect had been replicated by LENR researchers Edmund Storms and  Michael McKubre. "I  then knew LENR had to be primarily a surface effect and not a bulk reaction. I  knew that electron capture (electron + proton) played a key role in producing  neutrons and neutrinos," Larsen said. "I knew that surface plasmons  were key because gold loves to form surface plasmons. This helped me to  identify which electrons were participating with the protons/deuterons to make  neutrons via a collective weak interaction. "I  had all the concepts put together, but I needed an academic collaborator who  was well-published and who had the physics and calculation skills necessary to  help me complete the development of the theory. I hadn't done calculations like  this for many years."   "Around  March or April 2004," he said, "I began to look for a theoretical physicist  with strong experience in many-body collective effects, quantum electrodynamics  and condensed-matter physics. I knew that these were the required disciplines,  but they are a rare combination. Eventually – it took me a while – I found  Widom. Coincidentally, he was also a close personal friend of Giuliano  Preparata, a well-known LENR theorist. "Widom  had had no involvement or interest in LENR at the time. He was skeptical but  was willing to look at the experimental evidence and consider my theoretical  concepts. Together, we reviewed hundreds of papers dating back many decades,  all the way back to 1922; it took us about six months.  "We  found that the important work had happened outside the U.S. The  researchers overseas had much more open minds. Together, we worked out the  remaining details of the physical and mathematical mechanisms." At  the same time, Larsen learned that someone else also seemed to be closing in on  the idea. "In  October 2004, I was sitting in the audience at the ICCF-11 conference in Marseille, France,  and all of a sudden I heard Vittorio Violante [ENEA Frascati] start talking  about surface plasmons," Larsen said. "I nearly had a heart attack. I  thought Violante was going to publish the details of the mechanism before we  did." On  May 2, 2005, Larsen and Widom placed their concept in the public domain by  uploading the pre-print of their first  paper to the arXive server. They decided that Widom would be the senior  author. The first paper published on March 9, 2006, in European Physical  Journal C – Particles and Fields.  The  pair submitted several other  papers for publication. They later brought in Yogendra N. Srivastava for  his expertise in collective magnetic phenomena and Standard Model high-energy  particle physics.  They  placed their "primer" paper on the arXive server in 2008. It was  peer-reviewed, accepted and published by the American Chemical Society in 2009.  An expanded version of the paper has been accepted for publication in 2010 by Pramana  Journal of Physics, a refereed publication of the Indian Academy  of Sciences.  Larsen,  Widom and Srivastava ceased active collaboration in October 2008. Larsen then developed  and extended the theory to carbon fullerenes and aromatic rings.  "Ironically,"  Larsen said, "many reviewers take a quick look at our work and think we  are proposing 'cold fusion.' Of course, nothing could be further from the  truth."   ⇐ Previous Article — Table of Contents —  Next Article ⇒ |