Jump to Slideshows
Jump to Related Stories
"Steve, you have made an excellent point. Naked Emperor Class. I recommend that you pick words carefully and use them gently but precisely, for the issue is emotionally charged by the sincere efforts of good people."
- Mike Carrell, New Energy Institute board member, Jan. 5, 2008 |
At the time—in 1989—they didn't know what it was. Nobody knew. The best guess (according to some people, a poor guess) was that it was fusion. They didn't have enough information. Many persistent and bold researchers refused to give up. Some became desperate and tried to make data fit their theory of cold fusion. Other researchers were able to recognize the patterns and meaning of the data and formulate new theories.
Watch this video, it should explain everything:
2010 American Chemical Society Review of Low-Energy Nuclear Reaction Research. If it doesn't, .
Slideshow
|
| (Video) 2010 American Chemical Society Review of Low-Energy Nuclear Reaction Research (Direct link to video above) |
| (Slides) 2010 American Chemical Society Review of Low-Energy Nuclear Reaction Research |
| (Transcript) 2010 American Chemical Society Review of Low-Energy Nuclear Reaction Research |
| (Slides) 2008 American Chemical Society Review of Low-Energy Nuclear Reaction Research |
| (Audio) 2008 American Chemical Society Review of Low-Energy Nuclear Reaction Research |
| |
|
Related Stories
|
| Hagelstein Knew: It’s Not Fusion, Dec. 28, 2011 |
| Unicorns Versus Horses; Cold Fusion Versus LENR, Dec. 8, 2011 |
| Krivit’s LENR Interview for Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity, Dec. 8, 2011 (PDF) |
| Cold Fusion Versus LENR: Competing Ideologies, Jan. 31, 2011 |
| New Energy Times Special Report "Cold Fusion is Neither," July 30, 2010 (PDF) |
| On the Reality of LENR and the Mythology of Cold Fusion, March 20, 2010 |
| It Doesn't Look Like Fusion, Oct. 14, 2008 |
| |
|
